After Amazon, how many clouds do we need?

With news that Google and Microsoft plan to take on the Amazon Web Services monolith with infrastructure services of their own, you have to ask: How many clouds do we need?

This Google-Microsoft news broken this week by Derrick Harris,  proves to anyone who didn’t already realize it, that Amazon is the biggest cloud computing force (by far) and as such, wears a big fat target on its back. With the success of Amazon cloud services, which keep started out as plain vanilla infrastructure but have evolved to include workflow and storage gateways to enterprise data centers, Amazon’s got everyone — including big enterprise players like Microsoft, IBM and HP worried. Very worried.

These vendors are betting big that they can give Amazon a run for its money and that their cloud services will help them retain existing customers and (knock wood) win some newbies.

Amazon as enterprise apps platform? Don’t laugh

Take the news late this week that IBM is working with Ogilvy and Mather to move the advertising giant’s SAP implementation from its current hosted environment to  ”SmartCloud for SAP Applications hosted in IBM’s state-of-the-art, green Smarter Data Center.” (Note to IBM: brevity is beauty when it comes to branding.)

Don’t think that little tidbit is unrelated to news last week that SAP and Amazon together certified yet another SAP application — All-in-One — to run on Amazon’s EC2.  This sort of news validates Amazon as an enterprise-class cloud platform and that’s the last thing IBM or HP or Microsoft wants to see happen.  So every one of these players — plus Google — are taking aim at Amazon.

For some hardware players, including HP, which is reportedly about to cut 30,000 jobs see the cloud as a way to stay relevant, and oh by the way, keep customers workloads running on their hardware and software.  HP’s OpenStack-based public cloud went to public beta earlier this month.

Case in point: Along with the SAP migration news,  IBM also said its SmartCloud Enterprise+, IBM’s managed enterprise cloud infrastructure offers:

“unprecedented support for both x86 and P-Series [servers] running … Windows, Linux and AIX on top of either VMware or PowerVM hypervisors….


SCE+ is designed to support different workloads and associated technology platforms including a new System z shared environment that will be available in the U.S. and U.K. later this year.

Hmmm. P-Series and System Z —  not exactly the sort of commodity hardware that modern webscale cloud companies run, but they are integral to IBM’s well-being.

Vendor clouds to lock customers in

This illustrates what all prospective buyers should know: Despite all the talk about openness and interoperability, a vendor’s cloud will be that vendor’s cloud. It represents a way to keep customers running that company’s hardware and software as long as possible. But legacy IT vendors are not alone in trying to keep customers on the farm once they’re there.

Amazon is making its own services stickier so that the more higher level services a customer uses, the harder it will be to move to another cloud.  As Amazon continues what one competitor calls its re-enactment of “Sherman’s march on Atlanta” by adding more services, legacy IT vendors are building cloud services as fast as they can in hopes that they can keep their customers in-house. For them, there had better be plenty of need for at least one more cloud.

Photo courtesy of Shutterstock user Ohmega1982,

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Infrastructure Q1: Cloud and big data woo enterprises
  • Forecasting the future cloud computing market
  • Infrastructure Q2: Big data and PaaS gain more momentum